| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 starcookie13 |
Date sent: 2017/12/11 21:27:10
I honestly think that the amount of VIP or higher that ignore people is absurd and the fact that Citizen's and above cant is also absurd. If I want to ignore someone and they're talking trash in the chat, I want to block them from my chat. The /ignore command shouldn't be a bought command because it can be used for useful things as a Citizen. Now it is my fault that I do get into many arguments BUT I still think it is a necessity. Now if you could add this for the Citizen's I would be very grateful :) |
starcookie13 |
Date sent: 2017/12/11 22:06:19
If anyone has anything to add on to this please add to it (If you're a VIP or higher please don't give some shit reasons of why you don't agree) |
 Tye |
Date sent: 2017/12/12 00:05:20
+1 I agree. I've already asked about this in-game chat, but I don't remember the response. I do believe that at least Citizen should get /ignore, since there is a lot of people that need some ignoring lol. |
 galbby5 |
Date sent: 2017/12/12 01:20:35
+1 |
 Presinus |
Date sent: 2017/12/12 03:37:33
+1"If everybody ignored problem players, fewer witnesses may report them." My opinion: If that were true, nobody should have /ignore. If that were false, everybody should have /ignore. |
 luigiofthebakery Moderator |
Date sent: 2017/12/12 12:45:07
"If everybody ignored problem players, fewer witnesses may report them.""If that were true, nobody should have /ignore. If that were false, everybody should have /ignore." It's true, however that doesn't mean nobody should have /ignore. It just means that not everybody should have /ignore, so as long as there are a few people that don't have it then that's fine. It makes sense that lower ranks like citizen and default should be the ones to not have it, since they are also the ranks with the majority of players. If it were the other way around, where citizens got /ignore and donators didn't, that wouldn't make very much sense because donators are meant to have more permissions, and since the majority of players are citizens and defaults, it is less likely that there would be a time on the server with no citizens online than a time when there are no donators online. |
Tye |
Date sent: 2017/12/13 00:19:23
@Luigi: Hmm... What about Citizen+ then? I do see your reasoning why Citizens shouldn't now, but it should still be accessible in the lower ranks since God knows who needs to use it. |
luigiofthebakery Moderator |
Date sent: 2017/12/13 05:41:59
I don't see why it's so essential to have anyway, if someone doesn't want to see messages in chat by another player, they can simply ignore them and not respond. If it's as bad as harassment, swearing or spamming, then the offender should be punished. |
Presinus |
Date sent: 2017/12/13 12:43:02
@Luigi The staff give the players 40000 warnings before even considering punishing. |
 OfficalMinoi |
Date sent: 2017/12/13 21:45:25
@luigi forbiding name chances, banning players for building on their own base, not letting all players have /ignore.... are you trying to help the server or are you just trying to piss people off? |
Presinus |
Date sent: 2017/12/14 02:46:37
Forbidding name changes: When a player changes their username, they lose access to all of their locked or claimed possesions.Banning a player for building their base: Luigi didn't ban them, for one. For two, the player was banned for grief and lied about their ban reason. Not letting all players have /ignore: Read what he stated above. Honestly Minoi, it pains me how lacking you are. |
luigiofthebakery Moderator |
Date sent: 2017/12/14 09:36:16
Minoi I've already written countless articles on the forums about why name changes are forbidden, if you've forgotten go read up on them again because I'm not going to repeat myself. http://webbcraft.co.uk/forum/search.php?searchby=0&qdata=luigiofthebakery&titletext=&messagetext=username+changes&tperiod=any&date=&time=&searchfor%5B%5D=topics&searchfor%5B%5D=replies&cat=0&search=Search If building on their own base constitutes grief of someone else, then no it isn't allowed. If someone overclaims land of someone else and starts building a base there, that's not allowed, no matter what the claim says. Spawn town pathways are public land and belong to the server, no matter what claim they are in. Destroying the pathway is griefing those who would otherwise use the pathway to get to their house, or land beyond. As for /ignore, ignoring troublemakers isn't a solution to people breaking chat rules because there will always be players who haven't ignored them, including new players that join the server who would have to put up with them at least once before they use /ignore. |
starcookie13 |
Date sent: 2017/12/17 02:06:17
Yes but then if there's someone teasing you, the citizen's cant do anything it's like they're weak you should at least ask the staff or try it out and if it's over used then remove it. Try to at least <3 |
 pr1tce |
Date sent: 2017/12/17 02:11:08
+1 some people that just join the server are actually really nice and shouldn't have to deal with all the toxicity from a faction that i am not going to name |
 alpacafarm |
Date sent: 2017/12/19 00:58:07
LOL |
